Tag: Science Fiction

  • The Rose Field – Philip Pullman

    The Rose Field – Philip Pullman

    a book symbol, denoting a physical copy read

    The Book of Dust Book 3

    “Almost as If everything beautiful was in another world, and there was a doorway, and if I could only find it…”

    The Rose Field is the long-awaited conclusion to Philip Pullman’s Book of Dust trilogy, which follows on from His Dark Materials, the original epic fantasy/science-fiction trilogy that earned a place in hearts and bookshelves around the world over two decades ago.

    It’s impossible for me to discuss The Rose Field without situating it among the other five books in the series. Some (much) contrast and comparison and contextualisation is required – please bear with me.

    His Dark Materials follows eleven-year-old Lyra, who lives in an alternate universe much, but not quite, like our own. On gypsy river boats, the broomsticks of witches, the back of an armoured bear and the basket of a Texan aeronaut’s balloon, Lyra ventures all the way to the North Pole and into another world – where she meets Will, a fellow world-traveller from our own universe.

    As they travel between worlds together, they flee soul-sucking Spectres and befriend quadrupedal animals on wheels. They lead a march of the shadowy dead out from a purgatorial underworld and team up with fallen angels to do battle with the ultimate Authority. Flitting amongst all of this are Lyra’s own brilliant and terrible parents, partially estranged from her and each other, each pursuing their own academic obsession in parallel or perpendicular to Lyra’s endeavours.

    His Dark Materials is an exploration on the nature of consciousness, the perils of religion and the possibilities of the many-worlds theory of quantum mechanics. There is a lot going on, to the point where I imagine most editors would throw up their hands and cry, ‘Leave the kitchen sink behind!’

    Despite this, or because of it, I would go so far as to call it a perfect trilogy. Notoriously difficult as it is to satisfactorily end a fantasy series, this one has an ending of such bittersweet beauty as hasn’t been seen since Frodo sailed off to the Undying Lands on an elven ship. The level of brilliance required from Pullman to perfectly achieve such an ambitious endeavour is nothing short staggering.

    If you haven’t read this trilogy (Northern Lights, The Subtle Knife and The Amber Spyglass), go and do so immediately. I promise it will enrich your life. If it doesn’t, the Spectres must have got to you already. You’ll likely find it in the children’s section, but in my many re-readings since I first devoured it in my early teenage years, I’ve found new meaning and points of reflection every time. It’s one of those books that offers a page-turning magical adventure for young readers and philosophical contemplation (plus the page-turning magic) for older ones.

    After all of this preamble, we finally get to The Book of Dust, the second trilogy, of which The Rose Field is book three (I hope you’re keeping up). Seventeen years after the final installment of His Dark Materials, we got La Belle Sauvage – a prequel featuring Lyra as a baby, in which we see the origins of political and religious machinations in her world that drive much of the original trilogy.

    The second installment in The Book of Dust (trilogy #2) is The Secret Commonwealth, which jumps forward twenty years to Lyra as a young woman, having returned to her own world to a relatively normal and uneventful life. Ten years on from The Amber Spyglass, we meet her as a shadow of her former fiery self: bored, cynical and a bit depressed.

    The spark of magic was dimmed not just in her, but also seemingly in her whole world. So brimming with wonder and surprise in Northern Lights and still in La Belle Sauvage, the world of The Secret Commonwealth and The Rose Field is much more subdued, much closer to the humdrum nature of our own world. The armoured bears and aeronauts have retreated, giving way to electric vehicles and corporate takeovers.

    In The Secret Commonwealth, Lyra’s daemon (spirit-animal), Pantalaimon, leaves her and embarks on a solo journey to Central Asia in search of what he claims is Lyra’s lost imagination, and of course she must go after him. Malcolm, the young protagonist of La Belle Sauvage, who delivered Lyra to safety in a great flood, plays a starring role here, despite having never appeared in the original books. He sets off after Lyra to bring her safe home once again.

    Caught up in it all is another young man seeking vengeance, determined to hunt Lyra down, and it’s all set against a dangerous political backdrop in which Lyra and her friends are operating as dissidents in a world of religious authoritarianism.

    While La Belle Sauvage didn’t live up to the brilliance of the original trilogy, it felt like another excellent adventure story in the same universe, though it leaned rather than built upon the themes of HDM. The Secret Commonwealth was a little more sedate, perhaps overly philosophical, a little plodding. I found it flawed but enjoyable, with a strong-enough story, and all the strengths of the original world, characters and ideas. The Secret Commonwealth ends with Lyra alone in the desert of Karamakan, searching for Pantalaimon and the imagination she’s lost.

    I was so looking forward to the final chapter in the story that when the coronavirus pandemic arrived, I clamoured for the author, who was by then in his mid-seventies, to be locked up in quarantine under armed guard with only pen and paper and daily food rations while he finished the last book.

    Finally, in late 2025, The Rose Field was published.

    This final chapter picks up exactly where its predecessor left off and sees Lyra travelling into Syria and picking up a charming rogueish travel guide before meeting up with Malcolm in Aleppo. Pantalaimon, Lyra’s daemon, and Malcolm find themselves captured by gold-obsessed gryphons in a mountain tower and form an alliance with the witches to take on the Magisterium, a religious political body which has set about to destroy the entrances to other worlds.

    How all these plot lines connect is something of a mystery. Each time a new thread is started, there’s a sense of intrigue and excitement around how it will tie into the existing narrative and world. Sadly, most of these threads, some started in The Secret Commonwealth and some picked up fresh in The Rose Field, seem to get forgotten about and left on the cutting room floor.

    I’m doing my best here to avoid a full-blown rant about every plot line in The Rose Field that never got resolved. There is another side plot involving the resistance movement Lyra and Malcolm are part of, but this gets dropped about three quarters through and never seems to achieve anything.

    In His Dark Materials, Pullman shows himself to be capable of plot-mastery, but he fails to live up to it in the last two books of this second trilogy, and in The Rose Field most of all. You can almost feel, at times, the author’s dot points: ‘this must happen so that this can happen next and so that I can make this point about that.’

    Lyra’s ‘lost imagination’ is a core theme in The Secret Commonwealth and The Rose Field which never quite worked for me as a propulsive plot device. The journey through Central Asia is evocative but always somehow feels driven more by narrative necessity than by causal events and motivations that make total sense within the world of the book.

    If Philip Pullman has a weakness as an author to counter his many strengths, it’s a tendency to be a little didactic. He reigns it in to a surprising extent in his novels, considering how controversial he can be in interviews, but the author’s strongly held opinions do sometimes peek through the page. In these last two books it feels like his editorial leash has been slackened. The books get longer, but not better. In fact, by the end of The Rose Field it felt like Pullman had broken the leash altogether and run off solo to howl at the moon. He claims he revisited Lyra’s story after all these years because it hadn’t really finished. But it felt in this final book like he wrested the story away from his protagonist and turned it into a vehicle for a personal political diatribe.

    The characters we came to love in His Dark Materials are mostly forgotten in this second chapter, replaced by (ironically) much more forgettable supporting characters, who never seem to have much to do. The exception is Mr Ionides, Lyra’s roguish travel guide, who is totally charming but whose role in the story ultimately feels tangential.

    Lyra as a young woman lacks a lot of the spirit and sense of fun she had as a girl. This is in part what drives the story in these last two books – she must reclaim her lost sense of self – but it does mean that as a character she’s a little less charming company than she was in the first three books. This same goes for Malcolm the man. While there is nothing especially wrong with him, herein may lie the problem. He’s solid, steadfast, learned, capable and infinitely sensible. In other words, he’s a bit dull.

    Taken at face value, the majority of The Rose Field is an enjoyable-enough story. Pullman’s scene-by-scene writing is mostly as excellent as ever, though a little rough around the edges in parts. The pacing is particularly poor, some of the dialogue overly expository and at times he seems to even lose control of the omniscient point of view.

    Most of the way through, I felt The Rose Field was still a few drafts off a great book. Once I read the final page, I was in disbelief that the author would spend so much time and creative effort only to give the least satisfying possible resolution to a story he’s been immersed in for two decades.

    As a book, the sum of its parts is good enough, and even holds much promise. The whole is a giant mess, especially when considered as half of a 1200-odd page story, spread over two volumes (considering this as a continuation of The Secret Commonwealth) which never goes anywhere.

    If the narrative journey of Northern Lights could be likened to a mad dash on a snow sled culminating in a leap over an icy gorge, that of The Rose Field feels more like an aimless wander through a rose garden, during which occasionally you start sprinting towards something, only to run into a thicket of brambles and thorns which require a lengthy extrication process. The action moves forward at pace, then grinds to a halt as important plot points are revealed through long and plodding conversations. The next thing that happens will feel more randomly chosen than preordained. By the end, I felt that Pullman had fallen into a bramble so thick he couldn’t cut his way out. He clearly had many ideas but didn’t seem to be able to figure out how to tie them all together and it feels like, despite the long writing process, this book was rushed to publication way before its time.

    The conclusion we waited twenty years for could not be further from the exquisite ending of His Dark Materials that broke so many hearts.

    The ending of The Rose Field blows open plot holes the size of the Grand Canyon, drops characters by the wayside, cuts off every narrative thread and basically makes everything that came before it seem entirely pointless. It could be said it leaves plot holes large enough for a million soul-sucking Spectres to float through. Worst of all, it undermines and contradicts much of what happened in the original trilogy – especially the bittersweet conclusion – and makes us wonder what it was all for.

    I heard Pullman say in an interview that he rewrote the ending about eight times as his editor kept telling him it was no good, and he claimed the ending was much better for all the rewrites. What those alternative endings were, we may never know, but it’s hard to imagine anything worse than the one we got, which I can only imagine was a result of compromised creative visions, fatigue and compressed publication schedules.

    Of course, in my rage and disbelief once turning the final page, I immediately turned to the wisdom of Reddit and found some small solace in the outpouring of frustration from other readers over the plot holes, side quests, discontinuities and disservices to the original story and felt similarly let down by this (lack of a) conclusion. It’s rare that an ending can be so dissatisfying as to almost make you want to erase the whole book (or books) but The Rose Field comes pretty close.

    Avid readers of His Dark Materials waited two decades for this final installment to give our beloved Lyra’s story a continuation worthy of its beginning and the resolution she deserved. It didn’t have to be a happy ending, but it should have been a story worth telling.

    The quote at the top of this post hit hard for me: the character is describing unearthly music heard in another world through a portal he could never find. I spent much of my young life believing that everything beautiful was in another world. I went through doorway after doorway in search of it. It took a long process of growing up to learn that beauty was in front of me all along – including, but not in any way limited to, wondrous creations of the imagination.

    But Philip Pullman created one of the most beautiful otherworlds I ever had the fortune to escape to. To pick up the story after all these years only to finish it in such a way as to make the whole six-book-long endeavour seem pointless felt like setting a bomb to this wondrous creation that meant so much to so many. This is, of course, a childish attachment to what is ultimately just a set of books. But I’m sure the author would agree that putting away childish things entirely is no good way to grow up.

    Ultimately, I salute Philip Pullman on creating not just one but three perfect books. His Dark Materials has given me so much joy, so much contemplation, over the years. I even read some lines from The Amber Spyglass at my wedding. I wish him only the very best in his well-earned retirement from creative life. (Please, Philip, no more.)

  • Dragonflight – Anne McCaffrey

    Dragonflight – Anne McCaffrey

    Audiobook narrated by Sophie Aldred

    Drummer beat and piper blow

    Harper strike and soldier go

    Free the flame and sear the grasses

    Till the dawning red star passes

    Floundering in my endless quest to find great new fantasy / sci-fi / dystopian reads, I recently decided to revisit some fantasy books I had enjoyed in my teenage years and see how they held up to rereading.

    This one did not hold up. I was left feeling somewhat ashamed of my teenage-self, who happily chowed through quite a number of books in this series. I struggle to match up the teenage-self of my memory—who I’m sure was an erudite reader of the classics and a deep thinker with highly sophisticated taste—with the one who enjoyed this drivel enough to return to the library for sequel after sequel.

    First published in 1968, Dragonflight was a pioneer of the genre and has clearly served as inspiration for many other books and series since—including possibly the entire ‘romantasy’ genre. It won McCaffrey both a Nebula and a Hugo award, making her the first woman to win either of those prizes. The story is of a young woman, Lessa, who escapes a life of servitude to become a dragon queen tasked with saving her planet from destruction.

    All of this is a strange precursor to the following statement, which is that this is possibly the most sexist novel I’ve ever read (with the possible exception of Cormac McCarthy’s Outer Dark.)

    On the distant planet of Pern, far into the future, humans have set up an agrarian colony which has functioned for over 2000 years with just one major problem. The irregular orbit of a neighbouring planet periodically brings it close enough to cause atmospheric changes that result in ‘Thread’ (think acid rain) to fall from the sky, turning fertile soil to wasteland. Cue the dragonriders, who combat the falling Thread with fire-breathing dragons, genetically engineered from an endemic reptile species.

    Lessa is the sole survivor of a noble family killed by a usurper. She survives by disguising herself as a kitchen maid serving her family’s murderers—until one day she is rescued / captured by the dragonrider F’lar, who sees in her a chance to regenerate his declining weyr (dragon commune) in preparation for the next Threadfall, a threat the people of Pern have all but forgotten.

    So far so good. As a plot summary, Dragonflight is excellent. As a book, not so much. It’s hard to believe that such a great premise could be so poorly executed, especially considering that McCaffrey is not an untalented writer.

    Even as I get this all down, my appreciation for the world, the ideas and the premise of the story is almost making me feel like reading it again. It’s the same devil’s voice that keeps telling me I want to watch the Harry Potter movies one more time, only to find that they haven’t got any better in the last decade. It’s that part of me that can’t relinquish the idea of how good something could have been, despite reality having resoundingly proven it otherwise. McCaffrey’s worldbuilding is excellent and her prose is solid and assured, but these can’t redeem the faults in other essential story elements.

    After her forceful translocation, Lessa imprints with the gold dragon queen, forming a telepathic bond, and becomes Weyrwoman of Benden Weyr. It sounds like our girl has risen to great heights, except that it turns out the duties of the esteemed Weyrwoman turn out to mostly comprise cleaning, housekeeping and stocking the pantry. And she’d better do it right, or Weyrleader F’lar will shake her. That’s right, physically shake her. He does this a lot.

    “Oh, F’lar will be so angry with me. He will shake me and shake me. He always shakes me when I disobey him.”

    The story alternates between Lessa’s and F’lar’s point of view, which is one of its key weaknesses as F’lar is about the most unlikeable character ever put to the page. Which is unfortunate for Lessa, because as the Weyrleader bonded to the bronze dragon, F’lar is bonded to her, too.

    The telepathic bond shared between dragons and their riders extends to a seasonal dragon mating flight, during which the dragons’ bonded human pairs get tangled up in the passion. This means the dragonriders don’t choose their romantic or sexual partners, which results in some loose boundaries around consent. This is the way of things at the weyr and generally accepted, but Lessa, an outsider, is inadequately warned or prepared. Worse, F’lar continues to ‘share her bed’ after this event (sans synchronous dragon sex), despite Lessa’s total lack of enthusiasm. While the lack of consent is acknowledged, it’s not judged as particularly problematic, either by F’lar or by Lessa, which makes the story an incredible legitimisation of rape culture.

    He had been a considerate and gentle bedmate ever since, but, unless Ramoth and Mnementh were involved, he might as well call it rape. Yet he knew someday, somehow, he would coax her into responding wholeheartedly to his lovemaking. He had a certain pride in his skill, and he was in a position to persevere.

    Passages like the above are hard to read, and it’s hard to spend so much time inside the head of someone so deeply unlikeable.

    All those years ago I remember being disturbed by an even-more egregious scene in the second Dragonriders book where the love interest of a young, scared female character sexually assaults her to ‘prepare’ her for the dragon-mating experience with another rider—a crime presented and accepted as an act of necessary cruelty with her best interests in mind. I had forgotten how much this scene exemplified the norms within the Pern novels.

    Though she hardly started the trend. McCaffrey feels like an unhelpful instalment in the long line of female writers propagating damaging norms around sexualised violence and coercive control, sold as titillation (looking at you, Fifty Shades of Gray).

    It would have been so nice to see the controlling, arrogant F’lar get his comeuppance in this story, or perhaps a redemptive character arc. But no. F’lar is possessed of a unique foresight and strategic skill. All his unpopular theories turn out to be true. He thinks he can continually rape Lessa until she starts to like it, and guess what…

    All this makes me think of other times I’ve had the discussion: ‘is it a sexist book, or just a book depicting a sexist world?’ Many people point to the fact that the culture around consent and gender norms was very different in the sixties when this book was written, but that doesn’t seem like an adequate explanation.

    No one has ever accused Jane Austen or the Brontes of degrading women in their work, though they wrote in a time far behind 1960s America in terms of women’s standing in society. The female characters in these books were fully realised humans who chafed against their constraints and grew as a result, shaped in partnership or in opposition to the world around them.

    I don’t think it’s particularly hard to distinguish a sexist book from a sexist world. In the former, female characters are poorly developed, often thrown in only as love interests for the male characters, and limited in ways that the narrative does not recognise or address. In the latter, female characters are given equal or greater depth to their male counterparts. Their needs and desires are equally recognised by the narrative, if not by those around them, and form the shape of their character arc.

    And honestly it’s hard to judge Dragonflight by this measure, as all the characters are so flat and one-dimensional that it’s hard to know what any of their needs and wants are. What can be determined is that the book legitimises the treatment of women in the reactions of the female characters, or the lack thereof.

    Where Lessa should be a feminist icon, riding out on her gold dragon to save the planet, she feels more like a mute wallflower, living in fear of F’lar’s temper and the inevitable shaking that ensues whenever he catches her ‘disobeying’ him. Instead of rising up against this or finding ways to grow in opposition to his treatment, Lessa never seems to question F’lar’s right to manhandle and rape her. All she needs is a bit of time for his arrogant charms to work their wiles.

    Riding on plot momentum and curiosity alone, I pushed through to the end of Dragonflight. But if I seem hazy on how the story ends or have got some details incorrect, it’s because I didn’t care enough to rewind if I fell asleep halfway through a chapter or got distracted by a bird and missed a chunk of storyline. I should mention that narrator Sophie Aldred does a great job and her lilting tones probably played a significant role in getting me through the book.

    From an exciting story premise and some strong worldbuilding, McCaffrey is able to extract only shadows of characters, who float through the world lazily pushing the plot along. The decision to tell half the story from F’lar’s perspective steals the spotlight from the female protagonist, who is under-developed and, while much more sympathetic, also just not that much fun. The character interactions are shallow and at times baffling. The readerly jaw, dropped initially by the rampant misogyny, ends up stretched in a giant and ongoing yawn.

    All I can say in defence of my younger self—and the judges who awarded this book the most coveted awards in the science-fiction and fantasy genres—is that it may have been, for both of us, a first encounter with such an elaborately conceived sci-fi world. I was perhaps so bedazzled by the idea of what the book could have been that I forgot to tell the devil on my shoulder to shut the hell up and give me something decent to read.

  • Why The Next Shelf?

    Why The Next Shelf?

    A photo of my actual bookshelf, overflowing and double-stacked

    There are three scents in the world that I can’t get enough of: forests, where damp compost mingles with new flowers and eucalypt; churches, with their candlewax and incense; and the smell of a book.

    The first thing I do when I start a new book is open it and smell the pages. The older and more loved the book, the better. I started doing this with my Harry Potter books when I was young and re-reading them for the 15th time.

    It was a grounding, calming action that immediately began the transition between worlds, the descent through the portal opened up within the page, absorbing me into the ink. The walls around me would shimmer and sway and disappear and in their place would be a castle, a forest glade, a distant planet, a land far far away.

    Every day I look at my bookshelf and I get excited about all the books I’m yet to read and I grieve the ones I worry I’ll never get to. I’m filled with angst about the brevity of life and the vastness of the collection of books I want to read – including the ones I don’t yet or may never even know about.

    Perhaps a week after I first drafted the above paragraphs about the smell of books, I had the pleasure of seeing Eddie Perfect’s stage rendition of Beetlejuice in Melbourne. The production contains one of my favourite-ever lines:

    There are two types of people in this world: new-car-smell people, and old-book-smell people. We are old-book-smell people!

    I guess I don’t need to elaborate on which camp I sit in.

    Over the course of my writing ‘career’, many people have told me, ‘you shouldn’t write for other people – just write for yourself’.

    I don’t hold with this advice in general. Of course, if you want to write purely to immerse yourself in the experience, that’s a wonderful thing. But don’t kid yourself (unless you’re a very, very special unicorn) that anyone is ever going to want to read your journal.

    It seems sensible to me that if you want your work to be read, you need to write it with the audience in mind. On the other hand, if you’re writing for enjoyment or self-therapy, write with only your own goal in mind.

    For the most part, I prefer to write things that I think might eventually be read by other people – even if they never are, I get more satisfaction from thinking that one day my work might provide interest or enjoyment to others (ironically, most of my creative writing has never seen the light outside my window).

    The Next Shelf is a different project, one that is really an exercise in self-indulgence. I really just want to write down my thoughts about the books I am reading and use it as a way to continually practise and develop my writing – and reading – craft, albeit within a narrow format.

    I don’t expect that anyone else will want to read this blog, but if, like me, you are obsessed with books and find yourself short of opportunities to discuss books with others who have read the same ones, or if you’re looking for recommendations (or anti-recommendations) then you might perhaps find some value here and I would welcome the company.

    Starting this blog at a time when I am both searching for employment and trying to break into freelance writing, rejections and judgements of being ‘not good enough’ form such a core of my daily experience that it’s refreshing to create a space for myself where there is zero intention or expectation of pleasing anyone else and any number of readers above zero will be counted as a gift.

    So there it is: this is a place for me to have a one-way discussion about books, although I will be surprised and delighted by any interaction via comments with further thoughts, disagreement or suggestions from anyone with the interest and time to follow along.